| Fourfold nonvanishing by minimal metrics and moving jetsLemma 8.1 · p. 35 | Supported lifting: Theorem 1.3, proof · p. 27 | Converts a real effective presentation to a rational one using finite rational linear constraints. This linear-algebra lemma uses no nonvanishing theorem and is distinct from the input to Corollary 1.4. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Conditional good minimal models for compact Kähler fourfoldsLemmas 7.16–7.17 · pp. 58–60 | Kähler abundance: Theorem 3.13, proof · pp. 29–30 | Supplies actual adjunction on normalized strata and strict discrepancy comparison over the exceptional locus. Both lemmas are dimension-free; the fourfold main theorem is not applied in all dimensions. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Abundance after nonvanishing for compact Kähler fourfoldsLemma 7.1 · pp. 51–52 | Kähler abundance: Lemma 4.3, proof · p. 74 | Uses torsion-freeness of the first higher direct image when the pair is klt off its floor and an actual positive adjoint multiple is pulled back from the base, to turn generic-fibre residue matching into extension of restricted sections. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Log abundance in characteristic zeroLemmas 7.1–7.5 · pp. 45–52 | Fourfold nonvanishing: §3 / Proposition 6.4 · pp. 8–12, 24 | Independent tools controlling centre degrees, moving multiplicities, slices, and finite covers of a fixed branch complement. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Uniform Pluricanonical Iitaka FibrationsLemma 5.2 · pp. 21–22 | slc indices: Lemma 6.6 · pp. 32–34 | Supplies the rational-image property of boundary-free nonabelian factors for the Hodge-rank theorem. The source lemma itself uses Log Abundance nonvanishing. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Uniform log Iitaka fibrations and bounded moduli denominatorsProposition 5.1 / Lemmas 5.2–5.3 · pp. 12–13 | slc indices: Input 6.3 / Lemma 6.4 · pp. 30–32 | Uses a quasi-étale product cover and stability under further covers to control the character on the volume form factor by factor. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Log abundance in characteristic zeroCorollary 11.2 · pp. 73–74 | Schnell: Theorem 3.1 / §4.1 · pp. 7–8 | Supplies a good minimal model, semiampleness, and effective exceptional comparison for a pseudo-effective canonical divisor. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Minimal metrics and interior injectivity for nef adjointsTheorems 1.1–1.2 · pp. 1–2 | Fourfold nonvanishing: Theorems 4.1–4.2 / §5 · pp. 13–20 | Identifies endpoint residual bundles with positive rational multiples of nef klt adjoints, supplying zero-Lelong metrics and interior injectivity. A nonzero section on the whole boundary additionally uses three-dimensional semi-dlt abundance and descent. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Log abundance in characteristic zeroTheorem 9.1 · pp. 62–69 | Fourfold nonvanishing: Theorem 7.1 / §7 · pp. 30–34 | Rules out coexistence of the fixed jets, flag, and movable curve constructed in dimension four. This input is the independent Frobenius theorem, not Log Abundance’s abundance theorem. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Fourfold nonvanishing by minimal metrics and moving jetsCorollary 1.2 · p. 2 | Supported lifting: Corollary 1.4, proof · p. 29 | Provides the first section on the original variety; combined with the independent Theorem 1.2 to obtain fourfold log abundance. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Lifting sections from the reduced support of an adjointTheorem 1.2 · p. 2 | Fourfold Iitaka: Theorem 2.1 / Proposition 2.2 · pp. 6–7 | Makes a nef adjoint with known nonvanishing semiample, in the model comparison preserving rounded section spaces in every degree. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Relative denominators and effective systems for log Calabi-Yau fibrationsTheorem 1.1 / Proposition 6.1 · pp. 2, 15 | Fourfold Iitaka: §3 / §10 · pp. 8, 48–49 | Controls moduli denominators and supplies a uniform degree generating the full field of a positive-dimensional big base. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Log abundance in characteristic zeroTheorems 1.1, 11.1 / Lemma 2.2 · pp. 2, 73, 8 | Fourfold Iitaka: §10 · p. 48 | Provides the qualitative first section from pseudo-effectivity. Uniform degree comes later from index and relative denominator arguments. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Log abundance in characteristic zeroTheorem 11.1 · p. 73 | Uniform Iitaka: Theorem 2.1 · p. 4 | Supplies all-dimensional projective lc good models, including nonvanishing and semiampleness on the model. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Arithmetic Stein-degree bounds for log Calabi–Yau pairsTheorem 1.1 · p. 1 | Uniform Iitaka: Proposition 3.2, proof · pp. 7–8 | Bounds the Stein degree of a coefficient-one component, controlling the index when a principal divisor descends by a field norm. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Uniform effective log Iitaka fibrations for fourfoldsLemma 5.1 / Corollary 5.2 / Lemma 5.4 · pp. 18, 20–21 | Uniform Iitaka: Lemma 6.2 · pp. 24–25 | Constructs a rational fibration from chains of covering families and bounds section orders and degrees on its leaves. Uses the arbitrary-dimensional chain lemmas, rather than the fourfold main theorem. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Uniform Pluricanonical Iitaka FibrationsTheorem 1.2 · p. 2 | Log Iitaka: Theorem 2.1 / Proposition 7.1 · pp. 5, 23–24 | Supplies a uniform trivializing degree on the generic fibre, fixing an exact pullback presentation. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Arithmetic Stein-degree bounds for log Calabi–Yau pairsTheorem 1.1 · p. 1 | Log Iitaka: Theorem 2.3 / Lemma 4.6 · pp. 5, 10–11 | Bounds the field extension from the Stein curve of a boundary component in the residue induction. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Log abundance in characteristic zeroTheorem 11.1 · p. 73 | Log Iitaka: Theorem 2.2 / §8 · pp. 5, 29 | Passes from nonnegative Iitaka dimension to a good model, where the effective-degree argument uses the semiample fibration. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Uniform Pluricanonical Iitaka FibrationsTheorem 1.2 · p. 2 | slc indices: Theorem 2.2 / §7.3 · pp. 5, 37 | Trivializes all lc normalization components in one even degree. The receiving paper adds conductor gluing. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Log abundance in characteristic zeroTheorem 11.1 · p. 73 | slc indices: Theorem 2.3 / Lemma 5.6 · pp. 5, 20–21 | Supplies good models of perturbed projective klt pairs in the Hodge-rank argument. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Log abundance in characteristic zeroProposition 2.5 / Theorem 9.6 / §10 · pp. 9–12, 69–73 | Kähler abundance: Proposition 2.10 · p. 12 | Uses Log Abundance’s full induction under the stated logarithmic subadditivity assumption to supply projective good models and effective exceptional comparison. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |
| Abundance after nonvanishing for compact Kähler fourfoldsTheorem 1.1 · p. 3 | Conditional Kähler models: Assumption 2.4 · p. 9 | Gives semiampleness once nonvanishing is obtained for the nef Kähler klt fourfold adjoint. The other two premises remain separate. | Input statement and the receiving connection compared; the complete input proof is not verified. |