OpenAI Math Digest
AI-GENERATED GUIDE

This guide may contain errors or inaccurate explanations. Check important claims and proofs against the original papers.

CATALOGUE 034 · PAPER 11 / 14 Overview

Relative denominators and effective systems for log Calabi-Yau fibrations

Exact pullback presentations, whole-fibre residues, and complete section spaces

For lc-trivial fibrations with total dimension at most four, the manuscript uniformly controls a generic-fibre trivializing degree and a Cartier denominator of the moduli b-divisor. The key is a form on the whole reduced special fibre after reduction to a curve. Its conductor compatibility kills the cyclic character recording the denominator. Separate applications recover complete systems over a big base and control torsion over a rationally connected base.

Read the manuscript on GitHub

1. Main results

Theorem 1.1 (RD, p. 2)

Exact presentation and moduli denominators

Fix a finite set $\Phi\subset[0,1]\cap\mathbb Q$ and an integer $1\le d\le4$. There are positive integers $p_0\mid p$, with $p_0$ clearing $\Phi$, and a rational DCC set $\mathcal B\subset[0,1]$, depending only on $d,\Phi$. Suppose $(X,B)$ is a projective complex lc pair of dimension $d$ with $B\ge0$ and coefficients in $\Phi$, and $f:X\to Z$ is a contraction onto a positive-dimensional normal projective base, with

$$ K_X+B\sim_{\mathbb Q}f^*D $$

for a $\mathbb Q$-Cartier divisor $D$. There exist $\psi\in\mathbb C(X)^*$ and $D_Z\sim_{\mathbb Q}D$ giving an equality of actual divisors

$$ K_X+B+\frac1{p_0}\operatorname{Div}(\psi)=f^*D_Z, \qquad D_Z=K_Z+B_Z+M_Z. $$

The effective boundary $B_Z$ has coefficients in $\mathcal B$; $(Z,B_Z+M_Z)$ is generalized lc; $\mathbf M$ is b-nef and $p\mathbf M$ is b-Cartier. If $(X,B)$ is klt, the base pair is generalized klt.

The bound concerns the chosen exact presentation, not every rationally linearly equivalent representative of $D_Z$. The integer $p_0$ trivializes the generic adjoint and controls the principal correction; $p$ makes the moduli part b-Cartier. No uniform basepoint-freeness follows as part of this statement.

Theorem 1.1 · p. 2

Proposition 6.1 (RD, pp. 15–17)

The full function field of a big base

If, in addition, $D$ is big, there is $m=m(d,\Phi)>0$ such that for every positive multiple $l\in m\mathbb Z_{>0}$ the complete system

$$ \left|\left\lfloor l(K_X+B)\right\rfloor\right| $$

is nonempty and its section ratios generate exactly $\mathbb C(Z)\subset\mathbb C(X)$. Its rational map is birationally equivalent to $f$ and to the Iitaka fibration of $K_X+B$. This recovers the embedded field, including its finite part. Sections belong to the reflexive divisorial sheaf; $l(K_X+B)$ need not be Cartier.

Proposition 6.1 · pp. 15–17

Proposition 7.1 (RD, p. 17; proof pp. 17–21)

Principal multiples over a rationally connected base

Fix $1\le e\le4$, a rational DCC set $I\subset[0,1]$, and an integer $p>0$. Let $Z$ be a normal projective complex variety of dimension $e$ with a rationally connected smooth projective resolution. Assume $(Z,B+M_Z)$ is generalized klt, $B\ge0$ has coefficients in $I$, and $\mathbf M$ is rational b-nef with $p\mathbf M$ b-Cartier. There is $\ell=\ell(e,I,p)>0$ such that

$$ D=K_Z+B+M_Z\sim_{\mathbb Q}0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \ell D\text{ is an integral principal divisor}. $$

Thus every $a\ell D$, $a\ge1$, is principal and $h^0(Z,\mathcal O_Z(a\ell D))=1$. One can take a common integer for any fixed subset of the stated dimensions.

Proposition 7.1 · pp. 17–21

Corollary 7.2 (RD, p. 21)

For a finite rational coefficient set $\Phi$, there is $r=r(\Phi)>0$ with the following property. Let $(X,B)$ be a projective klt fourfold pair, $B\ge0$, with coefficients in $\Phi$ and $K_X+B\sim_{\mathbb Q}0$. If a contraction $f:X\to Z$ has positive-dimensional base admitting a rationally connected smooth projective resolution, then $r(K_X+B)$ is an integral principal divisor. This includes $B=0$, and every positive multiple is principal.

Corollary 7.2 · p. 21

References on the arrows

Unprefixed numbers refer to this manuscript RD. The principal external inputs are:

2. Theorem 1.1: exact presentation and special-fibre residues

Proof route. Theorem 1.1 fixes an exact presentation and moduli denominators. The applications split into Proposition 6.1, recovering the full function field of a big base, and Proposition 7.1 / Corollary 7.2, giving principal multiples over a rationally connected base.

Fix an exact presentation in degree $p_0$ on the generic fibre, then prove integrality of $pM_W$ at each prime of a smooth base model. The local denominator is detected by a cyclic character on residues along the whole special fibre.

Cyclic residue comparison clearing the denominator
Underlined citations open the sources. Tap the figure to enlarge it.Open figure ↗TeX source ↓

1. Descend in the same degree and fix the exact presentation

The geometric generic fibre has dimension at most three. The low-dimensional slc index theorem principalizes its adjoint in a uniform degree. Ratios of conjugate principalizing functions are constants, so Hilbert 90 descends the principalization to the fibre over $\mathbb C(Z)$ in the same degree $p_0$. Comparison with the original pullback relation produces the exact equality (1.1), since a function with vertical divisor is constant on the generic fibre. The effective lc boundary gives the rank-one condition for an lc-trivial fibration. The qualitative canonical bundle formula then descends $\mathbf M$ to a nef divisor on a smooth model $W$ (§3, pp. 6–7).

§3 · pp. 6–7 · JL, Corollary 1.6 · FG, Theorem 3.6

2. Slice to detect the denominator and remove the error

For $P\subset W$, put $\alpha=\operatorname{coeff}_P D_W$ and let $t_P$ be the threshold for the crepant sub-pair. The coefficient of $M_W$ differs from $\alpha+t_P$ by an integer. It suffices to show $p(\alpha+t_P)\in\mathbb Z$. A transverse curve slice retains $\alpha$ by specifying canonical representatives through residues. After a relative dlt MMP, the error $E_N$ is vertical by generic-fibre negativity, and nefness plus fibre connectedness makes it proportional to the fibre. The original threshold-attaining component has zero error coefficient, forcing that proportionality constant to vanish. Locally one obtains

$$ p_0(K_N+T+H)+\operatorname{Div}(\psi_C) =p_0\beta f_N^*[c],\qquad \beta=\alpha+t_P. $$

Pseudo-effectivity is used in the four-dimensional termination input (§4, pp. 7–10).

§4, (4.1)–(4.6) · pp. 7–10 · CT, Theorems 1.1–1.2

3. Obtain a form on the entire special fibre

Lemma 5.1 (pp. 10–15) clears the denominator in this identity. A depth theorem and conductor adjunction make the reduced fibre $T$ slc. Global ACC puts the different coefficients in a finite set. The JL index theorem supplies a nowhere-vanishing form $u$ of uniform even degree $p$ on the log pluricanonical line of all of $T$.

Lemma 5.1, (5.1)–(5.4) · pp. 10–13 · JL, Corollary 1.6

4. Make each residue ratio constant on the cyclic cover

Write $p_0\beta=a/m$ in lowest terms and normalize the base change $w^m=z$, obtaining $\pi:Y\to N$. Coefficient comparison makes every fibre multiplicity divisible by $m$, so $\pi$ is étale in codimension one. The form $s=(\pi^*\theta)^{\otimes p_0}\pi^*\psi_Cw^{-a}$ carries character $\zeta^{-a}$. On each normalized component, compare $\operatorname{res}(s^{p/p_0})$ with $\pi^*u$. Adjunction in a sufficiently divisible auxiliary degree shows their ratio is constant. This auxiliary degree may depend on the pair.

Lemma 5.1, (5.9)–(5.11) · p. 14

5. Match constants at double crossings and kill the character

Back in the uniform degree $p$, the next residues at a double crossing agree because $p$ is even, forcing the constants to agree across components. Connectedness handles the group action even when it permutes components. Thus $\zeta^{-ap/p_0}=1$, giving $m\mid p/p_0$ and $p\beta\in\mathbb Z$.

Lemma 5.1, (5.12), conclusion · p. 15

3. Proposition 6.1: complete section spaces recover the full base field

The exact presentation identifies complete section spaces; effective birationality on the base identifies their ratio field. Put $L=K_X+B$ and assume $p_0\mid l$ in the diagram.

Effective systems and the entire Iitaka field
Underlined citations open the sources. Tap the figure to enlarge it.Open figure ↗TeX source ↓

1. Transfer the complete section space to the base

Set $L=K_X+B$ and assume $p_0\mid l$. The exact presentation yields an equality inside $\mathbb C(X)$:

$$ H^0(X,\mathcal O_X(\lfloor lL\rfloor)) =\psi^{l/p_0}f^*H^0(Z,\mathcal O_Z(\lfloor lD_Z\rfloor)). $$

For the reverse inclusion, divide a source section by $\psi^{l/p_0}$. It is regular on the generic fibre and hence belongs to $\mathbb C(Z)$. Effectivity descends by testing a pullback component of positive multiplicity dominating each prime of the base. This valuation argument applies to reflexive sheaves ((6.1)–(6.2), p. 16).

(6.1)–(6.2) · p. 16

2. Construct birational systems on a base model with effective boundary

On a resolution $q:W\to Z$, the potentially negative exceptional coefficients of the crepant boundary are replaced as follows. Let $A$ be the strict transform of $B_Z$ plus the reduced exceptional divisor. Then

$$ K_W+A+M_W=q^*D_Z+E_W,\qquad E_W\ge0\text{ is }q\text{-exceptional}. $$

The left side is big, the boundary coefficients lie in a fixed DCC set, and $pM_W$ is nef Cartier. Apply [BZ, Theorem 1.3].

(6.3) · p. 16 · BZ, Theorem 1.3

3. Recover the embedded base field from all section ratios

Push its birational sections to $Z$, and transfer them to $X$. The common factor $\psi^{l/p_0}$ cancels in ratios, which generate the entire base field. Taking $m=\operatorname{lcm}(p_0,b_1,\ldots,b_d)$ works for every positive multiple (pp. 16–17).

Proposition 6.1, conclusion · pp. 16–17

4. Proposition 7.1 and Corollary 7.2: coefficients and class-group torsion

Construct the integer clearing coefficients separately from the integer killing class-group torsion. ACC and $p\mathbf M$ supply the former; boundedness and a rationally connected resolution supply the latter. Multiply them at the end.

Principal multiples over rationally connected bases
Underlined citations open the sources. Tap the figure to enlarge it.Open figure ↗TeX source ↓

1. Use extraction and ACC to reach boundedness

Construct ordinary klt boundaries to obtain small $\mathbb Q$-factorializations and extractions of specified valuations for the generalized pair. Applying global ACC also after extraction gives a finite boundary coefficient set and a uniform positive lower bound on generalized log discrepancies. A numerically trivial nef part is treated separately by ordinary global ACC. [Bir, Theorem 1.7] then bounds the bases up to isomorphism in codimension one (pp. 17–19).

Proposition 7.1 · pp. 17–19 · Bir, Theorem 1.7

2. Bound the torsion exponent through bounded topology

For $U=Z_{\mathrm{reg}}$, the group $H_1(U(\mathbb C),\mathbb Z)$ is unchanged upon removing codimension-two subsets. Semialgebraic triviality in a bounded family gives only finitely many such groups. A rationally connected resolution $Y$ has $\operatorname{Pic}^0(Y)=0$, so $\operatorname{Cl}(Z)$ is finitely generated. Kummer theory gives

$$ \operatorname{Cl}(Z)[n]\simeq \operatorname{Hom}(H_1(U(\mathbb C),\mathbb Z),\mu_n). $$

For fixed $Z$, the orders on the left stay bounded as $n$ varies. Hence $H_1$ has no free summand. The finite list of finite groups supplies a uniform torsion exponent $T$.

Proposition 7.1, (7.1) · pp. 20–21

3. Clear actual coefficients before principalizing

Separately, the finite boundary coefficient set and integrality of $pM_Z$ give an integral actual divisor $qD$. Its class is torsion, so $\ell=Tq$ makes it principal (pp. 20–21).

Proposition 7.1, conclusion · p. 21

4. Pull the principal divisor back to the total space

Corollary 7.2 applies Theorem 1.1 with $D=0$ and pulls back the resulting principalization, choosing $r$ divisible by $\ell,p$:

$$ r(K_X+B)=\operatorname{Div}\bigl((v\circ f)^{r/\ell}\psi^{-r/p_0}\bigr). $$

Corollary 7.2, (7.2) · p. 21

5. Which papers supply which steps

Separate the uses in Fourfold Iitaka. The exact presentation of Theorem 1.1 and the complete systems of Proposition 6.1 enter the final effectivity step. Principal multiples over rationally connected bases from Proposition 7.1 instead enter the index bound in Lemma 4.6 of that paper (pp. 15–16).

InputUseVerification
JL, Corollary 1.6, v1 p. 2§§2–3 and Lemma 5.1: uniform indices for projective slc log Calabi–Yau pairs of dimension at most three, including a global form with gluing.Statement and application compared.
FG, Theorem 3.6, p. 1726 / PDF p. 7§3: qualitative b-nefness and descent after checking rank one.Statement and use compared.
CT, Theorems 1.1–1.2, v2 p. 2§4, p. 9: flip termination for pseudo-effective four-dimensional NQC lc pairs, and for three-dimensional pairs.Dimension and pseudo-effectivity conditions compared; full details of Remark 2.11 not compared.
HMX, Theorems 1.1 / 1.5, PDF pp. 2–3Threshold ACC in §3, finite different coefficients in §5, and ordinary global ACC in §7.Statements and uses compared.
BZ, Theorem 1.3, p. 3; Theorem 1.6, pp. 4–5Effective birationality for big polarized pairs in §6 and generalized global ACC in §7.Statements, rounding convention, and applications compared.
Bir, Theorem 1.7, v2 p. 6§7: boundedness up to codimension-one isomorphism for rationally connected generalized $\epsilon$-lc Calabi–Yau varieties.Statement and application compared.

The manuscript's uses of Kollár's depth, adjunction and gluing theorems, Delfs–Knebusch semialgebraic triviality, Kummer theory, and Riemann existence were read; the individual external theorem texts were not separately compared.

Section 3 (pp. 8–9) of the fourfold Iitaka manuscript takes this paper's Theorem 1.1, Proposition 6.1, and Proposition 7.1 as Theorem 3.1, Proposition 3.2, and Proposition 3.3. All three restatements were compared; all downstream applications were not investigated. The low-dimensional slc input here is JL; it must not be replaced by the high-dimensional slc index manuscript in Catalog 034.

6. Return to the sources

Read the proof text of §§2–7 (pp. 4–21), tracing the exact presentation, disappearance of the dlt-model error, the character argument in Lemma 5.1, and the complete-section-space equality (6.1). In §7, read the extraction–ACC–topology–torsion sequence. Visually checked the character exponent, $p\beta$, and Proposition 6.1 on PDF p. 15.

The complete proofs of external inputs, external foundations for depth and pluriresidue gluing, and an independent audit of all topological hypotheses in §7 remain outside this check. Japanese and English versions retain the same statements, formulas, section structure, and verification status. Source links use the fixed-commit GitHub viewer; pages are stated in the labels.

Back to catalogue 034 →

Enlarged figure

Scroll to move around the figure. Underlined citations remain clickable.