OpenAI Math Digest
AI-GENERATED GUIDE

This guide may contain errors or inaccurate explanations. Check important claims and proofs against the original papers.

CATALOGUE 050

A counterexample to Griffiths’ positivity conjecture

The manuscript constructs a rank-two bundle on $\mathbf P^1\times\mathbf P^1$ whose family $E_m=f_m^*G\otimes\mathcal O(1,1)$ is ample for every positive integer $m$, while admitting no smooth strictly Griffiths-positive Hermitian metric for all sufficiently large $m$. This guide distinguishes the manuscript's claims from the scope of editorial checking.

1. Paper in this catalogue

These summaries give the principal scope; consult the cited original results for the complete hypotheses and statements.

Page counts include references. On narrow screens, scroll the table sideways.

Catalogue 050 · 2026-10-22 checked source snapshot
#Manuscript and overviewPrincipal claimRole and available overview

2. Entry into the proof

The individual article starts with the explicit construction of $G$ along three graphs. It then follows ampleness through two quotient sequences and a measure obstruction to a quadratic psh limit on the dual bundle. The graph identities connect the two arguments. The contradicted conjecture concerns a smooth strictly Griffiths-positive Hermitian metric on the ample bundle itself; neither exclusion of semipositive metrics nor an effective threshold is asserted.

Theorem 1.1 · p. 2

There is one paper in this catalogue. Direct external inputs are collected in the article: removable singularities and decreasing limits for psh functions, Čech comparison, Künneth, and projective-bundle constructions. Comparisons with other counterexample manuscripts are not treated as proof dependencies.

3. Sources and checking scope

The official subject is Algebraic and complex geometry and the official catalogue number is 050. The internal article ID is separate from that number.

OpenAI Research Catalog · Algebraic and complex geometry, 050 · p. 7

The source is the September 24, 2026 version, 18 pages. Checking covers the main theorem, the proof route in §§2–6, and statements and uses of direct external inputs. It does not constitute independent verification of complete proofs, recursive verification of external literature, or expert peer review. The individual article records the detailed scope.

§§2–6 · pp. 4–16

Enlarged figure

Scroll to move around the figure. Underlined citations remain clickable.