OpenAI Math Digest
AI-GENERATED GUIDE

This guide may contain errors or inaccurate explanations. Check important claims and proofs against the original papers.

CATALOGUE 187

Snaky in 21 Maker moves

Official catalogue 187 contains one manuscript in Combinatorics. It proves a win from the empty board by composing conditions that survive every legal reply and bounding the height of a finite certificate. “21” is an upper bound on actual Maker moves, not an optimality assertion.

1. Manuscripts in official order

These summaries give the principal scope; consult the cited original results for the complete hypotheses and statements.

Page counts include references. On narrow screens, scroll the table sideways.

Catalogue 187 · 2026-10-15 checked source snapshot
#Manuscript and overviewPrincipal claimRole and available overview

2. Reading route

Begin with the main proof overview: composition of conditions, an empty requirement, then a single policy. The composition lemma explains coverage of every reply; the finite certificate explains the number 21. The article's main-results section states the board, move order and target shape.

A one-paper catalogue does not need inter-paper categories or a relation diagram. Branching and merging within the proof appear in the article's overview and composition diagrams; the intersection details appear in a table. Direct dependencies, consequences, alternative proofs and generalizations involving other catalogues remain uninvestigated, rather than being declared absent.

3. Sources and checking scope

OpenAI Research Catalog · Catalogue 187; Combinatorics · p. 20

The field name and ordering follow the official overview. Combinatorics is the seventh subject heading (subject ID 13), spanning catalogue numbers 155–192 and PDF pp. 17–21; this entry is on p. 20. The reference is the October 6, 2026 overview in official repository snapshot 1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a.

Astra wrote the new draft from the original sources and self-checked the game quantifiers, both turn conventions in composition, the final intersection, policy extraction, actual-move accounting and finite-board restriction. Two author-provided reconstructors were freshly rerun; the dedicated local-reply suite and Lean compilation were not run. See the article's source section for the full scope and remaining limitations.

This guide and the article are AI-generated explanations. They do not replace the original or guarantee mathematical correctness; consult the linked manuscript, proofs and data before using the results in research.

Enlarged figure

Scroll to move around the figure. Underlined citations remain clickable.