OpenAI Math Digest
AI-GENERATED GUIDE

This guide may contain errors or inaccurate explanations. Check important claims and proofs against the original papers.

CATALOGUE 037

The sharp ordinary-double-point volume gap

The two papers in Catalogue 037 study normalized volumes of boundary-zero complex algebraic klt singularities. The all-dimensional paper uses the fourfold paper as an induction base and claims the upper bound $2(n-1)^n$ for singular $n$-dimensional germs, with equality precisely for an analytic ordinary double point (ODP).

1. The two papers in official order

These summaries give the principal scope; consult the cited original results for the complete hypotheses and statements.

Page counts include references. On narrow screens, scroll the table sideways.

Catalogue 037 · 2026-10-12 checked source snapshot
#Manuscript and overviewPrincipal claimRole and available overview

2. From the fourfold input to all dimensions

The official order lists the all-dimensional paper first, but the direct proof input runs in the opposite direction. The keys in the diagram refer to the following fixed manuscripts. The reference guides before the figures in each article specify the statements, roles, and versions of external inputs.

  • [OpenAI26a] OpenAI — The ordinary-double-point gap in every dimension. September 24, 2026. The local gap in all dimensions, equality, and the global corollary. 原典 / Original.
  • [OpenAI26b] OpenAI — The normalized-volume gap in dimension four. September 24, 2026. The fourfold induction base. 原典 / Original.
The fourfold base, all-dimensional induction, and the consequence for singular Fano varieties
Underlined citations open the sources. Tap the figure to enlarge it.Open figure ↗TeX source ↓

The fourfold paper forces embedding dimension at most $5$ from a large normalized volume, reduces to a hypersurface, and invokes the established lci volume theorem. The all-dimensional paper imports this fourfold bound and equality characterization as Theorem 2.4. Together with the known cases $n=2,3$, it starts the induction for $n\ge5$. An intermediate comparison involving singularities of the same dimension uses the supremum $M_n$ of their volume densities, without assuming the gap still to be proved.

[OpenAI26b, Theorem 1.1, p. 1] [OpenAI26a, Theorem 2.4, p. 9] [OpenAI26a, Theorem 7.7; §8.2, pp. 48, 52]

The global volume bound for singular K-semistable $\mathbb Q$-Fano varieties also requires a local-to-global comparison. The paper does not claim sharpness or classify equality for this smaller singular bound. Its separate bound $2n^n$ for $V\not\simeq\mathbb P^n$, including equality, combines the strict singular estimate with an external theorem for smooth varieties.

[OpenAI26a, Corollary 1.2, p. 3] [OpenAI26a, §8.3, p. 53]

Source → applicationRelationInput and place of use
Fourfold paper, Theorem 1.1 → all-dimensional paper, Theorem 2.4 and §8.2Direct proof inputThe bound and analytic equality characterization for boundary-zero complex algebraic klt fourfold germs supply the $n=4$ induction base.
All-dimensional paper, Theorem 1.1 → its Corollary 1.2 and §8.3Use in a consequenceApply the local bound at a singular closed point and then the local-to-global comparison to bound the anticanonical volume.

The all-dimensional statement includes the fourfold statement, but this does not mean that the fourfold proof depends on the all-dimensional paper. The fourfold article explains the hypersurface reduction; the all-dimensional article explains induction, recovery of equality, and the global corollary.

3. Sources and checking scope

The official overview calls this catalogue The sharp ordinary-double-point volume gap; CONTENTS uses The ordinary-double-point volume gap. Its field is Algebraic and complex geometry. The order and manuscripts are fixed at commit fd4aeeb2ee4fc729c18d98444fed42fd0529eeeb. Both manuscripts are dated September 24, 2026, and have 57 and 20 pages, including references.

OpenAI Research Catalog · Catalog 037 · p. 5

The articles describe the authors' claims and proof strategies. Editorial checks compared the main hypotheses and conclusions, selected proof passages, and the inter-paper input and application against the sources. They include checking by someone other than each article's writer, but do not constitute expert peer review or independent verification of every proof. Full details of the semigroup and filtration constructions, analytic estimates, and proofs of external theorems remain outside this checking scope; each article and its source record give finer limitations.

Enlarged figure

Scroll to move around the figure. Underlined citations remain clickable.