OpenAI Math Digest
AI-GENERATED GUIDE

This guide may contain errors or inaccurate explanations. Check important claims and proofs against the original papers.

CATALOGUE 004

Hilbert’s tenth problem over ℚ

Catalogue 004 contains a manuscript on undecidability of rational solvability and a pointwise 2-converse for elliptic curves used to construct its local conditions. The final logical step is a Turing reduction from integer solvability to rational solvability; it does not establish an existential definition of the integers.

1. Papers in official catalogue order

These summaries give the principal scope; consult the cited original results for the complete hypotheses and statements.

Page counts include references. On narrow screens, scroll the table sideways.

Catalogue 004 · 2026-10-15 checked source snapshot
#Manuscript and overviewPrincipal claimRole and available overview

References on the arrows

The following keys distinguish the two manuscripts. The diagram separates the direct input between manuscripts from subsequent uses within a single manuscript.

  • OpenAI26H: OpenAI, Hilbert’s tenth problem over the rational numbers, October 6, 2026. Supplies finite rational tests, pole parity, the five-point contact-height bound and undecidability.

[OpenAI26H, Theorem 1.1, p. 3]

  • OpenAI26P: OpenAI, A pointwise 2-converse for elliptic curves with rational two-torsion, October 7, 2026. Supplies analytic and Mordell–Weil rank equality and finiteness of $\operatorname{Sha}$ when the full $2^\infty$-Selmer corank is zero or one.

[OpenAI26P, Theorem 1.1, p. 2]

Printed pages agree with PDF positions. GitHub previews do not automatically jump to a cited page.

2. From a pointwise 2-converse to finite tests

How rational points from the pointwise 2-converse join height bounds and local comparisons in finite rational tests
Underlined citations open the sources. Tap the figure to enlarge it.Open figure ↗TeX source ↓

1. Realizing a Selmer class by a prescribed rational point

The pointwise 2-converse directly enters Lemma 3.4 of the Hilbert manuscript. The curve is $E_l:y^2=x(x-l)(x+3l)$, and two-descent gives $$ r+\dim_{\mathbf F_2}\operatorname{Sha}(E_l/\mathbf Q)[2]=1. $$ The proof first checks that the full $2^\infty$-Selmer corank is at most one. It then uses the finiteness of $\operatorname{Sha}$ supplied by the converse. Alternation of the Cassels–Tate pairing on the finite 2-primary group makes $\dim\operatorname{Sha}[2]$ even, giving $r=1$ and $\operatorname{Sha}[2]=0$. The selected Selmer class $\gamma=(\beta,1)$ is therefore represented by a rational point.

[OpenAI26H, Lemma 3.4, pp. 23–24]

Lemma 3.6 supplies one parameter for two twists. Applying the rational-point conclusion to both gives a positive existential condition $\Phi$ that holds on every integer. Outside finitely many exceptional primes, $\Phi$ excludes poles of odd order but allows poles of even order. This one-sided condition is not a definition of $\mathbf Z$. See the Hilbert article and the 2-converse article.

[OpenAI26H, Proposition 2.8, p. 12]

[OpenAI26H, §3.4, pp. 24–26]

2. Combining local comparisons and heights in one model

If all finite tests succeed, compactness produces a ring $R$ with a root in an elementary extension of the rational field. Its elliptic index map $\eta:R\hookrightarrow{}^*\mathbf Z$ is additive; multiplicativity has not been established. Pole parity selects an appropriate tested local branch at a contact prime, and paired elliptic local tests give congruences between ring values and their indices.

[OpenAI26H, Lemma 2.10; Proposition 2.11, pp. 14–15]

Applying these congruences to the fixed root coordinates makes the $K$th power of each slope's contact radical divide the same $\delta=f(\eta(a))$. Together with the five-point estimate $h(s)\le H M(s)^c$, this yields a uniform height bound for all ring values when $\delta\ne0$. Quadratic growth of the elliptic canonical height forces the root indices into an ordinary finite interval; additivity and injectivity then recover an ordinary integer root. The prime-pattern construction supplies the ordinary model for the opposite implication: an integer root passes every test.

[OpenAI26H, Theorem 2.4, p. 9]

[OpenAI26H, §2.4; Proposition 2.12, pp. 12–17]

3. Turning a hypothetical decision procedure into a contradiction

Assume a rational-solvability decider exists. Each finite test uses finitely many rational-solvability queries, so parallel searches for an integer zero and for a failed test would decide integer solvability. The proof distinguishes hardcoding finitely many fixed arithmetic data from computing them afresh for each input polynomial. The reduction and normalization to degree at most four are covered in the Hilbert article.

[OpenAI26H, Corollary 7.1, pp. 56–57]

3. The direct input and its subsequent uses

Input resultUsed atRole and conditionsChecking scope
Pointwise 2-converse, Theorem 1.1Hilbert, Lemma 3.4Nonzero rational two-torsion and full Selmer corank $\le1$ are checked before using finiteness of $\operatorname{Sha}$Statements and application passages checked in both sources

The continuation through Proposition 2.8, local-branch selection and finite tests is a transitive route within the Hilbert manuscript. The 2-converse alone does not supply the height bound or effectiveness of the tests. Remark 3.5 of the Hilbert manuscript records replacement by a converse without the rational-two-torsion hypothesis; that alternative proof route is not checked here.

[OpenAI26H, Lemma 3.4, pp. 23–24]

4. Sources and checking scope

The official subject is Number theory, covering entries 001–031. Entry 004 appears on p.2 of the OpenAI Research Catalog, in the manuscript order shown above. The official repository is fixed at commit 1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a. The manuscript versions are October 6, 2026 and October 7, 2026 respectively.

OpenAI Research Catalog · Catalogue 004 · p. 2

  • Hilbert manuscript: read §§2.4–2.7 for finite tests and recovery of an integer root, §§3.3–3.4 for the pointwise-converse application and simultaneous realization on two twists, and §7 for the Turing degree and normalization.
  • Pointwise manuscript: check the full Selmer hypothesis of Theorem 1.1, then follow §9 through corank-zero interpolation, uniform odd normalization, and return to a corank-one curve using a fixed negative twist.

This guide checks the principal statements and connections against the proof text. It does not independently verify every integral interpolation and uniform estimate in the Pointwise manuscript, every height and sieve estimate in the Hilbert manuscript, or the complete proofs of external inputs. Each article records its reading and unresolved scope at the end.

Enlarged figure

Scroll to move around the figure. Underlined citations remain clickable.